JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 12, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Luis Carlos Macias Cardona

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Ley Estatutaria De La Administracion De Justicia
  • Publicidad fallos de la Corte Constitucional no está condicionada a salvamentos y aclaraciones de voto
  • Firma y fecha de providencias y conceptos de las altas cortes
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Sobre Porte Y Consumo De Dosis Minima De Estupefacientes
  • Rechazar solicitud de nulidad de Procuradora General de la Nación (E) de sentencia C-491/12 por extemporánea
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio, para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por considerar que la Corte Constitucional era manifiestamente incompetente para resolver lo solicitado por el recurrente.

Se rechaza por EXTEMPORANEO el recurso impetrado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (12 points)
  1. RECHAZAR por extemporaneo el recurso de suplica presentado por el ciudadano Luis Carlos Macias Cardona contra el auto de enero 14 de 2014, proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Ivan Palacio Palacio, mediante el cual resolvio rechazar la demanda formulada por ser la Corte Constitucional "manifiestamente incompetente " para resolverla.
  2. LUIS ERNESTO VARGAS SILVA
  3. Presidente
  4. MARIA VICTORIA CALLE CORREA MAURICIO GONZALEZ CUERVO
  5. Magistrada Magistrado
  6. Ausente con excusa medica
  7. LUIS GUILLERMO GUERRERO PEREZ GABRIEL EDUARDO MENDOZA MARTELO
  8. Magistrado Magistrado
  9. JORGE IVAN PALACIO PALACIO NILSON PINILLA PINILLA Magistrado Magistrado
  10. No interviene
  11. JORGE IGNACIO PRETELT CHALJUB ALBERTO ROJAS RIOS Magistrado Magistrado
  12. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.